Exchange Risks
Derivative exchanges have to deal with many types of risks, and each type of risk further complicates the pricing model.
Under-collateralization: when total user position values enlarge past the reserve liquidity of the exchange.
Mass liquidation congression: when the market is volatile, a large number of high-leverage positions will need to be liquidated as soon as possible.
Imbalance exposure: when the total position size of Long is much larger than Short (or vice versa), the derivative provider (exchange) is forced to take the unfavorable side of the market.
Price Manipulation: when the index prices is manipulated to unfairly extract value from the exchange liquidity reserves.
Challenges in addressing these risks:
The Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism is designed to counter the under-collateralization risk, which introduces much more complexity to the application design.
Liquidating many user positions requires high throughput, high peak capacity, and predictable systems. This solution is extremely expensive in blockchain as the technology is not (yet) designed for high-performance applications like this.
Imbalance exposure is controlled by adding the premium fee to the funding rate, which further complicates the funding rate calculation.
Price manipulation risks require exchanges to fetch and compose index prices from multiple sources. The index prices are also restricted to only high-cap, low-volatility markets.
Last updated
Was this helpful?